Safaricom and Starlink: Exploring the Controversy Surrounding LEO Satellite Services in Kenya
legitimate and reflect common industry challenges. Balancing innovation
with regulation is complex, and careful consideration is needed to ensure
that both new technologies and traditional operators can thrive in a fair
and dynamic market.
Kind regards,
Andrew K Kipkebut PhD.
Lecturer /Coordinator Innovation and Business Incubation
Kabarak University,
Phone:0719499615.
Homepage <www.kabarak.ac.ke/innovations> | Linkedin
<www.linkedin.com/in/dr-andrew-kipkebut-phd-14578a206/?trk=public_post_feed-actor-image&originalSubdomain=ke>
| Google scholar
<scholar.google.com/citations?user=gQDrrtcAAAAJ&hl=en>
———————————————————————————————-
*Innovation is the specific instrument of entrepreneurship*
————————————————————————————————
On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 at 10:54, Victor Kapiyo via KICTANet <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Ben Roberts has written an insightful blog on the issues around the
> controversy that came up online following Safaricom’s letter to the
> Communications Authority (CA) regarding the regulation of new services
> enabled by Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellites such as Starlink.
>
> The letter raised concerns about potential stifling of innovation and
> unfair competition, especially in the context of Starlink’s broadband
> services and the emerging “Direct to Mobile” technology.
>
> According to Ben, Safaricom’s letter primarily focuses on the regulatory
> considerations for “Direct to Mobile” services, seeking participation in
> international discussions to establish technical standards and ensure a
> level playing field for all operators.
>
> Read more:
> cioafrica.co/safaricom-vs-starlink-whats-the-fuss-all-about/
>