ict practitioners bill is back

Phares,

You have not answered the question. How do you sue a public official who is
not legally obliged to deploy technology to improve security in your ward?

Why would the most technologically advanced nation have laws to force
public officials to deploy technology?

www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/1232

www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2017/05/11/doc2017financialmanagementconference-fitara.pdf

Please study and explain why we do not need a law such as this..
On Dec 18, 2017 7:31 PM, \”Phares Kariuki\” <[email protected]> wrote:

Phares,
> Without a law or court order, how will contract law compel the county
> admin in your locality to ensure, for your own security, CCTV is installed,
> working at strategic locations in your ward?

If a court, an arm of government, cannot compel action wither an
association?

It\’s simple – if it fails to work – a legal suit is filed. This is common
practice globally. You also have sign offs before payment – if the
contractor doesn\’t complete the work, isn\’t it a failure of the county?
Paying for goods not delivered? Surely you don\’t have a restaurant
regulatory body to ensure that Java serves you a fresh cup of coffee….

A necessary reading for folks to understand the benefits of rule of law is
The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails
Everywhere Else by Hernando de Soto Polar https://www.amazon.com/
dp/B00CW0MA1S/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 6:50 PM, S.M. Muraya <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Phares,
>
> Without a law or court order, how will contract law compel the county
> admin in your locality to ensure, for your own security, CCTV is installed,
> working at strategic locations in your ward?
>
> On Dec 18, 2017 5:16 PM, \”Phares Kariuki via kictanet\” <
>