Day 1 Talk2Facebook ~ Content Moderation

Walu,
That\’s actually interesting….non interference in the US but engagement
with government in Africa? What makes different spaces get different
approaches?
GB

On Wednesday, 16 September 2020, Walubengo J <jwalu@yahoo.com> wrote:

> At the moment FB is struggling with online content issues with respect to
> the US elections…from media reports I get the feeling they are preferring
> the non-interference stance to content but I stand to be corrected.
>
> I get the feeling fake-news on digital platform may require capacity
> building of the general masses – over and above what FB may, or may not do.
>
> walu
>
> On Wednesday, September 16, 2020, 12:06:33 PM GMT+3, Grace Mutung\’u via
> kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Teacher Karis,
> With regard to content moderation, I am wondering if Facebook has anything
> in the pipeline for upcoming Kenya elections. This is coming from reports
> on their recent work in Ethiopia. I got the sense that Facebook engaged
> with the government but still didn\’t help to contain content that led to
> offline violence. There is also a sense from civil society reports that
> Facebook took down content that should have stayed up or may have blocked
> dissenters. My question is therefore what they learnt from that experience
> in Ethiopia or other African countries they have engaged in.
> Warm regards,
> Grace
>
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 11:30, Ali Hussein via kictanet <
> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>
> My humble thoughts:-
>
> 1. How can we align current laws to go after the culprits who misuse
> platforms like these. With this, I also mean platform owners themselves.
> Policy Makers and Regulators the world over have unfortunately been caught
> flat-footed by these Gatekeeper Platforms. Like a knife, they can do a lot
> of good (in the kitchen!) but also be used as lethal weapons. How do we
> find the balance?
>
> 2. Let me ask a question – At a bar, a party, or even in the bedroom is
> there someone moderating our conversations or behaviors? Unless of course,
> you are in China where even the cockroach in your kitchen has been profiled
> by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party). This is not a joke…
>
> 3. The Net Neutrality (yes..still my pet peeve :-)) debate must be
> revived. If we all had paid attention to this critical issue we probably
> would not be having these conversations. For those of you who are new to Net
> Neutrality click here <en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality> to
> bring yourself up to speed.
>
> 4. Last but not least, Gatekeeper Platforms have a fiduciary
> responsibility and a social contract to keep the platforms clean and
> usable. The problem here is that we will be giving these guys too much
> power. Again, how do we find the balance?
>
> Regards
>
> *Ali Hussein*
>
> Digital Transformation
>
>
> Tel: +254 713 601113
>
> Twitter: @AliHKassim
>
> Skype: abu-jomo
>
> LinkedIn: ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim
> <ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim>
>
>
>
>
> Any information of a personal nature expressed in this email are purely
> mine and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the
> organizations that I work with.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 6:01 AM Kelvin Kariuki via kictanet <
> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>
> Hi There!
>
> Hoping you are having a great week, we are delighted to invite you to this
> 4 days series on “Talk2Facebook”, on Day 1, we are eager to hear from you
> on issues surrounding Content Moderation on FB!
>
> Content Moderation is a delicate balance between freedom of speech and
> censorship. Share your comments, experiences, and challenges with regard to
> Facebook Services along the following themes:
>
> a) Should FB be moderating digital content on their platform or should it
> be open and liberal?
>
> b) If FB can moderate content on its platform, how can it balance out
> different cultural expectations where a single post in one jurisdiction is
> considered acceptable while it becomes un-acceptable in another?
>
> c) How can FB moderate content without being considered a gatekeeper or
> violating freedom of speech?
>
> d) Has your content posted on FB ever been flagged as un-acceptable and
> what was your reaction/experience? Is there a process of appeal?
>
>
>
> We hope to hear from you today as tomorrow we will be talking about Data
> Protection Issues.
>
>
>
> Have a great day!
>
>
>
> Rest of the Program:
>
> Day 2: Data Protection
>
> Day 3: Human Rights & Transparency
>
> Day 4: Connectivity & Wrap Up
>
>
>
> Warm Regards,
>
> Tr. Karis
> Walu
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
> lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
> Facebook: www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at lists.kictanet.or.ke/
> mailman/options/kictanet/info%40alyhussein.com
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect people\’s times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don\’t flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
> lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
> Facebook: www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at lists.kictanet.or.ke/
> mailman/options/kictanet/nmutungu%40gmail.com
>
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect people\’s times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don\’t flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>
>
>
> —
> Grace Mutung\’u
> Skype: gracebomu
> @Bomu
> PGP ID : 0x33A3450F
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
> lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
> Facebook: www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at lists.kictanet.or.ke/
> mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect people\’s times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don\’t flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>